Sorry to get back on the topic of hair...but after going to an art museum, I realized that MOST of the very great nude paintings depict very little to no body hair on the women.
I was wondering why extreme feminists do not mock that art. Or maybe they do. But I ask: what is the difference between classic art and nude art now? Is it the fact that it is a real life photograph or the fact that the women are getting paid to be nude?
Well I say, if one has ever seen great art, they can look as real as any photograph. And that maybe those feminists should start declaring all the art museums' nude art be burned. That'll be the day.
I like how they all make themselves feel better by degrading women who probably do look better than them EVEN though feminism is supposed to be about accepting people as they are and gaining rights for ALL women. Good job, asshats. I hate you all.
"You don't come here to defend the beauty standards that keep us all in a constant state of insecurity and dependence. You come here to tear them apart."
WHAT?!?!?! I'm in a constant state of insecurity over my looks?!?!?! In fact, it's so insecure in my brain that I don't think I can open the door of my office or let people see me as I am. Another good job, asshats. I still hate you all.
And it makes me sad sometimes that they're are girls who, instead of focusing their energy, time and money on something productive, waste it on this shit. I might be "butch" or a "bull dyke" but fuck...I'm at least happy at one point in a day.
Yeah... Who is to say that other people aren't happy?
Did anybody watch that special last night (I think it was on ABC) about women who are trapped in situations out in Colorado City? I missed the first part but I was wondering what everybody thought about it.
I'm annoyed with this. I don't want to have every post about that dumbass community, but as no one is posting on either of the good communities, I'll rant here.
A lot of men and women who are in SM relationships. THIS IS NORMAL SEXUAL BEHAVIOR FOR THEM. Submissives are often sexual fantasies for both sexes. What is wrong with these people who don't understand that there are other forms of sex besides none at all.
just a note beforehand... i don't mean to offend anyone with my questions, but just in case my sentences are taken in the wrong way, please excuse my phrasing.
and with that, here's my question:
i'm doing a major report and am researching on the extremes women go to for beauty. breast augmentation, rhinoplasty, liposuction are beginning to be what is percieved as more "normal" and socially accepted, but with technological advancements and the like, doctors are coming up with more ways to enhance the appearance of a female.
things such as surgery on the labia to make it appear more attractive, give it a different colour; breaking the legs and lengthening them out over a period of time; amputation of sections of the toes to fit into high heels etc.
if anyone could suggest more "extreme" surgeries, i would really appreciate it.
also, suggestions for procedures which have occured throughout western history would also be very useful. like victorians and rib removal to achieve a further corseted waist.
if you would rather e-mail me, that is definitely fine! email@example.com
thank you in advance and please help me if you have any information, it will all be highly appreciated.